top of page
Free-thinking-ministries-website-logo.png

Is Calvinism a Different Gospel?

Writer: Dr. Tim Stratton
Dr. Tim Stratton
Jun 12, 2023
5 min read

Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Question

Dear Dr. Stratton,

Why do you spend so much time arguing with other Christians about free will? Why do you spend so much time arguing against Calvinism? We are all on the same team. We all worship the same God. We all share the same gospel. 

While these topics are very interesting and fun to think about, do they really make that much difference at the end of the day? 

- Jared

Dr. Tim's Response

Thank you for the question, Jared. I fear that answering it will make some of my friends quite angry. Be that as it may, I am committed to truth, and what I am about to communicate is -- I sincerely believe -- the truth and nothing but the truth.

So help me, God! 

The reason why this issue is so important -- and not some odd and abstract peripheral theological view -- is because although we all use the same words when sharing the gospel, after one looks under the hood (as it were), one will quickly see that the view Calvinists espouse is, quite frankly, a radically different understanding of the gospel than the one most Christians have in mind when sharing the good news with non-believers.

Notable Calvinist scholar, Matthew J. Hart, is clear: “Calvinists . . . are theological determinists. They hold that God causes every contingent event, either directly . . . or indirectly.” Since human thoughts and states of belief are contingent events, this means that God, according to Calvinistic determinism, causes each and every thought and belief, including all of our false and evil beliefs. In his work titled The Providence of God, Paul Helm -- who many consider to be the world's leading Calvinist philosopher -- explains where our thoughts come from according to his Calvinistic view:

“Not only is every atom and molecule, every thought and desire, kept in being by God, but every twist and turn of each of these is under the direct control of God. He has not, as far as we know, delegated that control to anyone else.”

If these scholars are correct in their assessment of Calvinism (that Calvinism entails exhaustive determinism), then I contend that Calvinism -- the view that God determines all things about humanity -- promotes the following incorrect views:

1- A low view of God.

As I've explained elsewhere, if exhaustive divine determinism is true, then God is a deity of deception and an untrustworthy source of theological beliefs. 

2- A low view of God's word.

Based on the transfer of trust principle, if God is an untrustworthy source of theological beliefs, then why should we trust a book authored by a deity of deception that is full of theological statements you are supposed to believe?  If God is untrustworthy, so is a book he inspired. Thus, appealing to Bible verses or to the original Greek does nothing to escape this presupposed false and low view of God and His word. 

3- A low view of man.

Man does not have the ability to reason free from antecedent conditions which are sufficient to necessitate all of his thoughts and beliefs. Man is nothing but a caused cause or a passive cog (a puppet) who is always tethered to prior deterministic forces. 

Thus, on this view, man does not have the active power to infer better beliefs in a deliberative circumstance. He is merely a passive cog who is determined (by something or someone else) to believe truth or to believe falsities.  

4- A low view of sin.

The definition of sin is to "miss the mark." However, there is no missing the mark if God determines all things about humanity. Everyone always hits the mark perfectly -- exactly as God determined. 

5- A low view of the gospel.

This, in my opinion, is the deal-breaker. Calvinism is a low view of the gospel. The gospel literally means "the good news." Here's how Christianity has traditionally understood this "good news" with the help of the G.O.S.P.E.L. acronym:

G – God--a perfect being--created all people to be in an eternal loving relationship with Him (that is the objective purpose of life – this is why humanity exist).(Psalm 100:3)

O – Our sins (emphasis on "our") infect us and separate us from God (like oil and water, necessary perfection and infection do not mix). (Romans 3:23)

S – Sins cannot be removed by good deeds (there’s nothing we as infected people can do about it – we need a miracle). (Isaiah 64:6)

P – Paying the price for sin, Jesus died and rose again (this is that miracle – Jesus paid it all). (Romans 5:8)

E – Everyone who freely trusts in Christ alone – and has not rejected His offer of love and grace – has eternal life (John 3:16).

L – Life with Jesus starts now and lasts forever (to infinity . . . and beyond). (John 10:28)

But Calvinism literally preaches a different gospel. Consider Paul's words in Galatians 1: 6-8:

"6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7 not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed."

Here's the Calvinist's different G.O.S.P.E.L.*:

G* - God created a few people to be with him. Most people were created for the specific purpose of eternal suffering in Hell.

Right off the bat, we see that this is not the Gospel message that has been preached in Scripture or through the history of the Christian Church. At the least, it's a radically different message than what most Christians have had in mind over the past 2,000 years when sharing the good news.

It gets worse . . .

O* – Our separation from God is caused and determined by God.

Let that sink in! 

S* – Sins are illusory.

As noted above, no one ever misses the mark (the definition of sin), but everyone does exactly what God determines us to do. Every arrow hits the bulls eye. 

P* – Paying the price for what God caused and determined all people to do, Jesus died and rose again.

At least Calvinists and non-Calvinist Christians all affirm the historical resurrection (but so do Mormons). 

E* – Everyone who God determines to go to heaven goes to heaven; everyone else (the majority of humanity) is determined to suffer in the fires of hell.

Unless, of course, the Calvinist affirms universalism and argue that allpeople are given irresistible grace and determined to go to heaven. Calvinists can also affirm annihilationism and contend that eternal separation from God is still determined by God (so the problem still remains), but there is no eternal conscious suffering. Both views are typically rejected by most Calvinists. 

L* – Life in hell lasts forever.

Does this sound like "good news"? No, in fact, it's horrible news to the vast majority of humanity. Calvinism is not the message of Christianity. It is a distorted understanding of the gospel that ought to be rejected by Christ followers. 

For a deeper dive into each of these topics and important related issues please watch this video. 

Stay reasonable (Isaiah 1:18),

Dr. Tim Stratton

Notes

 Matthew J. Hart, “Calvinism and the Problem of Hell,” in Calvinism and the Problem of Evil, edited by David E. Alexander and Daniel M. Johnson (Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2016), 248. Hart notes that Paul Helm—the leading Calvinistic philosopher today—is a theological determinist (Hart, “Calvinism,” 248n1). 

 Paul Helm, The Providence of God, Contours of Christian Theology, edited by Gerald Bray (Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 1993), 22, Logos.

19 Comments


blogcommentsieuviet
2 days ago

kuwin com làm mình quan tâm đến cách các khu vực chính liên kết khi mình chủ động đảo thứ tự sử dụng ở mỗi phiên. Mình có thể bắt đầu với Slot, chuyển sang Thể thao rồi Casino, trong khi lần sau lại đi từ Casino sang hai khu vực còn lại. Mỗi lần thay đổi, mình dựa vào tên danh mục và vị trí tương đối để xác định hướng tiếp theo. Việc lặp lại với những trình tự khác nhau giúp mình nhớ cấu trúc theo mối quan hệ giữa các nhánh thay vì theo lịch sử thao tác. Sau một thời gian, mình dễ tìm lại khu vực quen thuộc hơn dù điểm bắt đầu của từng…

Like

blogcommentsieuviet
6 days ago

jun88 giúp mình nhận ra rõ hơn cách những lựa chọn cùng phạm vi được liên kết khi mình chuyển nội dung liên tục. Mình thường để ý xem sau mỗi lần thay đổi mình có phải quay lại từ đầu để tìm khu vực hay không. Khi lần lượt xem Baccarat, Roulette và Blackjack, mình vẫn dễ nhận biết mình đang ở Casino dù cách thể hiện của từng nội dung có sự khác nhau. Những nhóm provider như Evolution Gaming hoặc Pragmatic Play lại tạo thêm một lớp nhận diện bên trong. Với mình, cách phân lớp này giúp nhìn được cả khu vực chung lẫn những lựa chọn nhỏ hơn mà không bị mất hướng.


Like

blogcommentsieuviet
Sep 22

https://mb66an.com/ làm mình quan tâm đến cách hành trình thay đổi khi mình tiếp tục sử dụng trên điện thoại. Mình thường quan sát những mốc đã quen để xem việc thu gọn không gian có làm cách xác định vị trí trở nên khác nhiều hay không. Trong một phiên, mình bắt đầu với Game bài, tìm Poker rồi chuyển sang Nổ hũ và chú ý các nội dung từ JILI. Các khu vực chính vẫn đóng vai trò làm điểm định hướng khi mình muốn chuyển bước tiếp theo. Với mình, sự tiếp nối này giúp cách sử dụng trên màn hình nhỏ không trở thành một luồng riêng, bởi những dấu hiệu từng ghi nhớ vẫn có thể…


Like

blogcommentsieuviet
Sep 20

mm88.com là nơi mình quan sát khá kỹ cách hệ thống xử lý khi người dùng nhập sai thông tin ở một trường dữ liệu. Mình thường kiểm tra từng trường riêng biệt rồi xem thông báo lỗi có xuất hiện ngay tại vị trí cần sửa hay không. Nếu cảnh báo được đặt gần trường nhập sai và diễn đạt cụ thể thì mình dễ xác định vấn đề hơn thay vì phải đọc một thông báo chung ở đầu trang. Mình cũng thử chỉnh lại dữ liệu sau khi nhận cảnh báo để xem trạng thái lỗi có được cập nhật ngay hay vẫn còn hiển thị thông tin cũ. Bên cạnh đó, mình chú ý xem những…

Like

blogcommentsieuviet
Sep 20

Go88 is more comfortable for me on mobile when I only need a short session. I might check lottery information, look at my account, and then spend some time with fish shooting without moving through many menus. On desktop, I tend to explore sports more because the larger screen gives me room to follow match information and odds. I appreciate that the basic organization remains recognizable across both devices. It means I can change the way I use the platform depending on the situation without having to learn a completely different navigation pattern.


Like
bottom of page